Mauritius vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Mauritius
12.80 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
7.97 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
42nd
Nepal rank
45th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Mauritius
  • Nepal
05.0M10.0M15.0M196519942023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 12.80 million current LCU per square kilometre against 7.97 million current LCU per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 4.83 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.6 times Nepal's.

Across all 48 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 42nd and Nepal ranks 45th of 203 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Nepal Difference Ahead
1970s 502,217 current LCU per square kilometre 81,932 current LCU per square kilometre 420,285 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 1.04 million current LCU per square kilometre 173,597 current LCU per square kilometre 864,679 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 2.91 million current LCU per square kilometre 599,854 current LCU per square kilometre 2.31 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 4.69 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.28 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 6.46 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.34 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.13 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 9.48 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.98 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.49 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Mauritius or Nepal?
Mauritius, at 12.80 million current LCU per square kilometre against 7.97 million current LCU per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Mauritius and Nepal?
4.83 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Nepal?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Nepal rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Mauritius ranks 42nd and Nepal ranks 45th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/nepal/">Mauritius vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.