Lesotho vs Tunisia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Lesotho
86,223 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
91,306 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho rank
140th
Tunisia rank
138th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Lesotho
  • Tunisia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 91,306 current LCU per square kilometre against 86,223 current LCU per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 5,083 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 140th and Tunisia ranks 138th of 203 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 745.97 current LCU per square kilometre 667.61 current LCU per square kilometre 78.36 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
1970s 1,457 current LCU per square kilometre 1,820 current LCU per square kilometre 363.1 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 3,353 current LCU per square kilometre 5,756 current LCU per square kilometre 2,402 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 9,557 current LCU per square kilometre 14,620 current LCU per square kilometre 5,063 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 19,889 current LCU per square kilometre 24,134 current LCU per square kilometre 4,246 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 39,603 current LCU per square kilometre 50,305 current LCU per square kilometre 10,701 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 72,688 current LCU per square kilometre 88,451 current LCU per square kilometre 15,762 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Lesotho or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 91,306 current LCU per square kilometre against 86,223 current LCU per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Lesotho and Tunisia?
5,083 current LCU per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Tunisia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Tunisia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Lesotho ranks 140th and Tunisia ranks 138th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Tunisia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/tunisia/">Lesotho vs Tunisia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.