Latvia vs East Timor: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Latvia
25,008 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
24,028 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
178th
East Timor rank
180th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Latvia
  • East Timor
010.0k20.0k30.0k199520092023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 25,008 current LCU per square kilometre against 24,028 current LCU per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 980 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was East Timor ahead.

Latvia ranks 178th and East Timor ranks 180th of 203 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 8,011 current LCU per square kilometre 9,418 current LCU per square kilometre 1,407 current LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 13,657 current LCU per square kilometre 18,541 current LCU per square kilometre 4,884 current LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 23,912 current LCU per square kilometre 21,683 current LCU per square kilometre 2,229 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Latvia or East Timor?
Latvia, at 25,008 current LCU per square kilometre against 24,028 current LCU per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Latvia and East Timor?
980 current LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and East Timor?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Latvia and East Timor rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Latvia ranks 178th and East Timor ranks 180th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs East Timor: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/timor-leste/">Latvia vs East Timor: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.