Latvia vs Panama: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Latvia
25,008 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
28,204 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
178th
Panama rank
177th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Latvia
  • Panama
010.0k20.0k30.0k197019962023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 28,204 current LCU per square kilometre against 25,008 current LCU per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 3,196 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Panama ahead.

Latvia ranks 178th and Panama ranks 177th of 203 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 4,348 current LCU per square kilometre 9,066 current LCU per square kilometre 4,717 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
2000s 8,011 current LCU per square kilometre 12,697 current LCU per square kilometre 4,686 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
2010s 13,657 current LCU per square kilometre 20,028 current LCU per square kilometre 6,371 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
2020s 23,912 current LCU per square kilometre 26,021 current LCU per square kilometre 2,109 current LCU per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Latvia or Panama?
Panama, at 28,204 current LCU per square kilometre against 25,008 current LCU per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Latvia and Panama?
3,196 current LCU per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Panama?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Panama rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Latvia ranks 178th and Panama ranks 177th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Panama: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/panama/">Latvia vs Panama: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.