Latvia vs Malta: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Latvia
25,008 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
29,062 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
178th
Malta rank
176th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Latvia
  • Malta
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k197019962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 29,062 current LCU per square kilometre against 25,008 current LCU per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 4,054 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 178th and Malta ranks 176th of 203 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 4,348 current LCU per square kilometre 239,093 current LCU per square kilometre 234,745 current LCU per square kilometre Malta
2000s 8,011 current LCU per square kilometre 277,343 current LCU per square kilometre 269,332 current LCU per square kilometre Malta
2010s 13,657 current LCU per square kilometre 269,539 current LCU per square kilometre 255,882 current LCU per square kilometre Malta
2020s 23,912 current LCU per square kilometre 327,995 current LCU per square kilometre 304,084 current LCU per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Latvia or Malta?
Malta, at 29,062 current LCU per square kilometre against 25,008 current LCU per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Latvia and Malta?
4,054 current LCU per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malta?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Malta rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Latvia ranks 178th and Malta ranks 176th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Malta: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/malta/">Latvia vs Malta: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.