Jordan vs East Timor: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Jordan
22,242 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
24,028 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
181st
East Timor rank
180th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Jordan
  • East Timor
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196519942023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 24,028 current LCU per square kilometre against 22,242 current LCU per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 1,786 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

Jordan ranks 181st and East Timor ranks 180th of 203 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 3,645 current LCU per square kilometre 9,418 current LCU per square kilometre 5,773 current LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 14,286 current LCU per square kilometre 18,541 current LCU per square kilometre 4,255 current LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 20,090 current LCU per square kilometre 21,683 current LCU per square kilometre 1,592 current LCU per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Jordan or East Timor?
East Timor, at 24,028 current LCU per square kilometre against 22,242 current LCU per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Jordan and East Timor?
1,786 current LCU per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and East Timor?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Jordan and East Timor rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Jordan ranks 181st and East Timor ranks 180th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs East Timor: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jordan/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jordan/timor-leste/">Jordan vs East Timor: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.