Jordan vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Jordan
22,242 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
25,008 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
181st
Latvia rank
178th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Jordan
  • Latvia
010.0k20.0k30.0k196519942023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 25,008 current LCU per square kilometre against 22,242 current LCU per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 2,766 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Jordan ranks 181st and Latvia ranks 178th of 203 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,680 current LCU per square kilometre 4,348 current LCU per square kilometre 2,668 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 3,645 current LCU per square kilometre 8,011 current LCU per square kilometre 4,366 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 14,286 current LCU per square kilometre 13,657 current LCU per square kilometre 628.59 current LCU per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 20,090 current LCU per square kilometre 23,912 current LCU per square kilometre 3,821 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Jordan or Latvia?
Latvia, at 25,008 current LCU per square kilometre against 22,242 current LCU per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Jordan and Latvia?
2,766 current LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Latvia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Latvia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Jordan ranks 181st and Latvia ranks 178th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jordan/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jordan/latvia/">Jordan vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.