Hong Kong vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Hong Kong
1.08 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
1.06 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
80th
Uruguay rank
81st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Uruguay
01.0M2.0M3.0M198320032023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 1.08 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.06 million current LCU per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 20,430 current LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 80th and Uruguay ranks 81st of 203 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 983,905 current LCU per square kilometre 214,168 current LCU per square kilometre 769,737 current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 1.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 571,753 current LCU per square kilometre 838,723 current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 1.77 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.08 million current LCU per square kilometre 694,006 current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Hong Kong or Uruguay?
Hong Kong, at 1.08 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.06 million current LCU per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Hong Kong and Uruguay?
20,430 current LCU per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Uruguay?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Uruguay rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Hong Kong ranks 80th and Uruguay ranks 81st of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/uruguay/">Hong Kong vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.