French Polynesia vs Gambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

French Polynesia
3.73 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2020
Gambia
3.18 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
57th
Gambia rank
60th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Gambia
02.0M4.0M6.0M196619942023

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 3.73 million current LCU per square kilometre against 3.18 million current LCU per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 550,140 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.2 times Gambia's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, French Polynesia has been ahead every year.

French Polynesia ranks 57th and Gambia ranks 60th of 203 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Gambia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.90 million current LCU per square kilometre 139,236 current LCU per square kilometre 2.77 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia
2000s 4.56 million current LCU per square kilometre 815,819 current LCU per square kilometre 3.75 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 4.67 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.38 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.29 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia
2020s 3.73 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.96 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.77 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, French Polynesia or Gambia?
French Polynesia, at 3.73 million current LCU per square kilometre against 3.18 million current LCU per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between French Polynesia and Gambia?
550,140 current LCU per square kilometre, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Gambia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
How do French Polynesia and Gambia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
French Polynesia ranks 57th and Gambia ranks 60th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Gambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/gambia-the/">French Polynesia vs Gambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.