Finland vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Finland
20,937 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
20,074 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
185th
Zimbabwe rank
186th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Finland
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196519942023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 20,937 current LCU per square kilometre against 20,074 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 863 current LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Finland ranks 185th and Zimbabwe ranks 186th of 203 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 6,645 current LCU per square kilometre 0.759 current LCU per square kilometre 6,644 current LCU per square kilometre Finland
1980s 12,075 current LCU per square kilometre 1.09 current LCU per square kilometre 12,074 current LCU per square kilometre Finland
1990s 12,636 current LCU per square kilometre 1.17 current LCU per square kilometre 12,635 current LCU per square kilometre Finland
2000s 13,034 current LCU per square kilometre 1.02 current LCU per square kilometre 13,033 current LCU per square kilometre Finland
2010s 15,130 current LCU per square kilometre 9.67 current LCU per square kilometre 15,120 current LCU per square kilometre Finland
2020s 18,914 current LCU per square kilometre 6,201 current LCU per square kilometre 12,713 current LCU per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Finland or Zimbabwe?
Finland, at 20,937 current LCU per square kilometre against 20,074 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Finland and Zimbabwe?
863 current LCU per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Zimbabwe?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Finland and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Finland ranks 185th and Zimbabwe ranks 186th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/finland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/finland/zimbabwe/">Finland vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.