Eswatini vs Morocco: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Eswatini
328,765 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
369,068 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
105th
Morocco rank
102nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Morocco
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 369,068 current LCU per square kilometre against 328,765 current LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 40,303 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Morocco ahead.

Eswatini ranks 105th and Morocco ranks 102nd of 203 countries.

Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 1,000 current LCU per square kilometre 7,703 current LCU per square kilometre 6,703 current LCU per square kilometre Morocco
1970s 3,303 current LCU per square kilometre 15,776 current LCU per square kilometre 12,473 current LCU per square kilometre Morocco
1980s 8,406 current LCU per square kilometre 44,424 current LCU per square kilometre 36,018 current LCU per square kilometre Morocco
1990s 35,703 current LCU per square kilometre 114,810 current LCU per square kilometre 79,107 current LCU per square kilometre Morocco
2000s 101,099 current LCU per square kilometre 158,940 current LCU per square kilometre 57,841 current LCU per square kilometre Morocco
2010s 215,369 current LCU per square kilometre 263,388 current LCU per square kilometre 48,019 current LCU per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 317,236 current LCU per square kilometre 319,938 current LCU per square kilometre 2,702 current LCU per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Eswatini or Morocco?
Morocco, at 369,068 current LCU per square kilometre against 328,765 current LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Eswatini and Morocco?
40,303 current LCU per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Morocco?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Morocco rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Eswatini ranks 105th and Morocco ranks 102nd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Morocco: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/morocco/">Eswatini vs Morocco: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.