Denmark vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Denmark
723,378 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
733,459 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
91st
Guatemala rank
90th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Denmark
  • Guatemala
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196519942023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 733,459 current LCU per square kilometre against 723,378 current LCU per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 10,081 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 91st and Guatemala ranks 90th of 203 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 141,964 current LCU per square kilometre 3,996 current LCU per square kilometre 137,968 current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 266,990 current LCU per square kilometre 9,555 current LCU per square kilometre 257,434 current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 611,307 current LCU per square kilometre 31,680 current LCU per square kilometre 579,627 current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 672,860 current LCU per square kilometre 185,092 current LCU per square kilometre 487,768 current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 547,010 current LCU per square kilometre 257,002 current LCU per square kilometre 290,008 current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 608,106 current LCU per square kilometre 431,749 current LCU per square kilometre 176,358 current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 725,204 current LCU per square kilometre 622,364 current LCU per square kilometre 102,840 current LCU per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Denmark or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 733,459 current LCU per square kilometre against 723,378 current LCU per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Denmark and Guatemala?
10,081 current LCU per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Guatemala?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Guatemala rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Denmark ranks 91st and Guatemala ranks 90th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/denmark/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/denmark/guatemala/">Denmark vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.