Chile vs Mauritius: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Chile
12.88 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
12.80 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
41st
Mauritius rank
42nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Chile
  • Mauritius
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 12.88 million current LCU per square kilometre against 12.80 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 77,300 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Mauritius ahead.

Chile ranks 41st and Mauritius ranks 42nd of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 46,558 current LCU per square kilometre 502,217 current LCU per square kilometre 455,659 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 355,136 current LCU per square kilometre 1.04 million current LCU per square kilometre 683,140 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 2.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.91 million current LCU per square kilometre 691,881 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 3.51 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.69 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.19 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 7.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.46 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.48 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2020s 11.65 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.48 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.17 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Chile or Mauritius?
Chile, at 12.88 million current LCU per square kilometre against 12.80 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Chile and Mauritius?
77,300 current LCU per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Chile ranks 41st and Mauritius ranks 42nd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mauritius: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/mauritius/">Chile vs Mauritius: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.