Burundi vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Burundi
156.38 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
161.10 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
13th
Rwanda rank
12th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Burundi
  • Rwanda
050.0M100.0M150.0M196519942023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 161.10 million current LCU per square kilometre against 156.38 million current LCU per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 4.72 million current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Burundi ranks 13th and Rwanda ranks 12th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 824,012 current LCU per square kilometre 988,083 current LCU per square kilometre 164,071 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 2.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.52 million current LCU per square kilometre 20,870 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 5.06 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.21 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.15 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 18.63 million current LCU per square kilometre 19.18 million current LCU per square kilometre 547,840 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 61.30 million current LCU per square kilometre 58.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.14 million current LCU per square kilometre Burundi
2020s 120.65 million current LCU per square kilometre 120.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 487,050 current LCU per square kilometre Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Burundi or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 161.10 million current LCU per square kilometre against 156.38 million current LCU per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Burundi and Rwanda?
4.72 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Rwanda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Rwanda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Burundi ranks 13th and Rwanda ranks 12th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burundi/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burundi/rwanda/">Burundi vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.