Brazil vs Lesotho: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Brazil
78,860 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho
86,223 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
142nd
Lesotho rank
140th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Brazil
  • Lesotho
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 86,223 current LCU per square kilometre against 78,860 current LCU per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 7,363 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Brazil ranks 142nd and Lesotho ranks 140th of 203 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 808.35 current LCU per square kilometre 808.35 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
1970s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 1,457 current LCU per square kilometre 1,457 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
1980s 0.0005 current LCU per square kilometre 3,353 current LCU per square kilometre 3,353 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
1990s 2,995 current LCU per square kilometre 9,557 current LCU per square kilometre 6,561 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 12,397 current LCU per square kilometre 19,889 current LCU per square kilometre 7,491 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
2010s 30,268 current LCU per square kilometre 39,603 current LCU per square kilometre 9,335 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 67,783 current LCU per square kilometre 72,688 current LCU per square kilometre 4,905 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Brazil or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 86,223 current LCU per square kilometre against 78,860 current LCU per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Brazil and Lesotho?
7,363 current LCU per square kilometre, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Lesotho?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Lesotho rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Brazil ranks 142nd and Lesotho ranks 140th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Lesotho: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/lesotho/">Brazil vs Lesotho: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.