Bhutan vs Hong Kong: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Bhutan
978,298 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong
1.08 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
83rd
Hong Kong rank
80th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Bhutan
  • Hong Kong
01.0M2.0M3.0M198020012023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 1.08 million current LCU per square kilometre against 978,298 current LCU per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 98,842 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 83rd and Hong Kong ranks 80th of 203 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Hong Kong Difference Ahead
2000s 172,952 current LCU per square kilometre 983,905 current LCU per square kilometre 810,952 current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 441,123 current LCU per square kilometre 1.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 969,354 current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 862,990 current LCU per square kilometre 1.77 million current LCU per square kilometre 906,770 current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Bhutan or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 1.08 million current LCU per square kilometre against 978,298 current LCU per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Bhutan and Hong Kong?
98,842 current LCU per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Hong Kong?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Hong Kong rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Bhutan ranks 83rd and Hong Kong ranks 80th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Hong Kong: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/hong-kong-sar-china/">Bhutan vs Hong Kong: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.