Belgium vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Belgium
153,007 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
147,076 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
124th
South Africa rank
127th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Belgium
  • South Africa
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 153,007 current LCU per square kilometre against 147,076 current LCU per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 5,931 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 124th and South Africa ranks 127th of 203 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 93,338 current LCU per square kilometre 37,095 current LCU per square kilometre 56,243 current LCU per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 101,308 current LCU per square kilometre 77,206 current LCU per square kilometre 24,102 current LCU per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 123,421 current LCU per square kilometre 133,571 current LCU per square kilometre 10,150 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Belgium or South Africa?
Belgium, at 153,007 current LCU per square kilometre against 147,076 current LCU per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Belgium and South Africa?
5,931 current LCU per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and South Africa?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and South Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Belgium ranks 124th and South Africa ranks 127th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belgium/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belgium/south-africa/">Belgium vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.