Belarus vs France: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Belarus
77,838 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
France
77,869 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
145th
France rank
144th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Belarus
  • France
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

France currently reports 77,869 current LCU per square kilometre against 77,838 current LCU per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 31 current LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 145th and France ranks 144th of 203 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus France Difference Ahead
1990s 35.06 current LCU per square kilometre 51,840 current LCU per square kilometre 51,805 current LCU per square kilometre France
2000s 2,776 current LCU per square kilometre 52,541 current LCU per square kilometre 49,764 current LCU per square kilometre France
2010s 27,735 current LCU per square kilometre 59,435 current LCU per square kilometre 31,700 current LCU per square kilometre France
2020s 66,311 current LCU per square kilometre 73,374 current LCU per square kilometre 7,063 current LCU per square kilometre France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Belarus or France?
France, at 77,869 current LCU per square kilometre against 77,838 current LCU per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Belarus and France?
31 current LCU per square kilometre, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and France?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and France rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Belarus ranks 145th and France ranks 144th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs France: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/france/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/france/">Belarus vs France: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.