Belarus vs Brazil: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Belarus
77,838 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
78,860 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
145th
Brazil rank
142nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Belarus
  • Brazil
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 78,860 current LCU per square kilometre against 77,838 current LCU per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 1,022 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Brazil ahead.

Belarus ranks 145th and Brazil ranks 142nd of 203 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Brazil Difference Ahead
1990s 35.06 current LCU per square kilometre 3,744 current LCU per square kilometre 3,709 current LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 2,776 current LCU per square kilometre 12,397 current LCU per square kilometre 9,621 current LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 27,735 current LCU per square kilometre 30,268 current LCU per square kilometre 2,533 current LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 66,311 current LCU per square kilometre 67,783 current LCU per square kilometre 1,472 current LCU per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Belarus or Brazil?
Brazil, at 78,860 current LCU per square kilometre against 77,838 current LCU per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Belarus and Brazil?
1,022 current LCU per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Brazil?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Brazil rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Belarus ranks 145th and Brazil ranks 142nd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Brazil: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/brazil/">Belarus vs Brazil: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.