Barbados vs Mexico: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Barbados
555,154 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
630,412 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
97th
Mexico rank
96th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Barbados
  • Mexico
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196519942023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 630,412 current LCU per square kilometre against 555,154 current LCU per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 75,258 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 97th and Mexico ranks 96th of 203 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Mexico Difference Ahead
1970s 215,576 current LCU per square kilometre 101.26 current LCU per square kilometre 215,475 current LCU per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 338,833 current LCU per square kilometre 4,538 current LCU per square kilometre 334,295 current LCU per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 311,814 current LCU per square kilometre 60,407 current LCU per square kilometre 251,407 current LCU per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 286,317 current LCU per square kilometre 156,367 current LCU per square kilometre 129,950 current LCU per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 482,470 current LCU per square kilometre 313,390 current LCU per square kilometre 169,079 current LCU per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 586,109 current LCU per square kilometre 550,412 current LCU per square kilometre 35,697 current LCU per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Barbados or Mexico?
Mexico, at 630,412 current LCU per square kilometre against 555,154 current LCU per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Barbados and Mexico?
75,258 current LCU per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Mexico?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Mexico rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Barbados ranks 97th and Mexico ranks 96th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Mexico: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/barbados/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/barbados/mexico/">Barbados vs Mexico: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.