Australia vs Botswana: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Australia
8,616 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana
7,808 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
195th
Botswana rank
196th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Australia
  • Botswana
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 8,616 current LCU per square kilometre against 7,808 current LCU per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 808 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 195th and Botswana ranks 196th of 203 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Botswana Difference Ahead
1990s 2,088 current LCU per square kilometre 919.4 current LCU per square kilometre 1,168 current LCU per square kilometre Australia
2000s 3,391 current LCU per square kilometre 1,928 current LCU per square kilometre 1,463 current LCU per square kilometre Australia
2010s 4,961 current LCU per square kilometre 4,901 current LCU per square kilometre 60.37 current LCU per square kilometre Australia
2020s 7,053 current LCU per square kilometre 7,013 current LCU per square kilometre 39.82 current LCU per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Australia or Botswana?
Australia, at 8,616 current LCU per square kilometre against 7,808 current LCU per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Australia and Botswana?
808 current LCU per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Botswana?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and Botswana rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Australia ranks 195th and Botswana ranks 196th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Botswana: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/botswana/">Australia vs Botswana: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.