Aruba vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Aruba
14,728 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
16,722 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
192nd
Zambia rank
189th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Aruba
  • Zambia
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 16,722 current LCU per square kilometre against 14,728 current LCU per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 1,994 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 192nd and Zambia ranks 189th of 203 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 66,367 current LCU per square kilometre 1,172 current LCU per square kilometre 65,195 current LCU per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 4,108 current LCU per square kilometre 6,742 current LCU per square kilometre 2,634 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 5,483 current LCU per square kilometre 14,321 current LCU per square kilometre 8,839 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 9,975 current LCU per square kilometre 17,110 current LCU per square kilometre 7,135 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Aruba or Zambia?
Zambia, at 16,722 current LCU per square kilometre against 14,728 current LCU per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Aruba and Zambia?
1,994 current LCU per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Zambia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Zambia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Aruba ranks 192nd and Zambia ranks 189th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/aruba/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/aruba/zambia/">Aruba vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.