Aruba vs Greenland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Aruba
14,728 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland
9,246 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
192nd
Greenland rank
194th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Aruba
  • Greenland
020.0k40.0k60.0k199520092023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 14,728 current LCU per square kilometre against 9,246 current LCU per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 5,482 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.6 times Greenland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Greenland ahead.

Aruba ranks 192nd and Greenland ranks 194th of 203 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Greenland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Greenland Difference Ahead
2000s 4,368 current LCU per square kilometre 4,406 current LCU per square kilometre 37.95 current LCU per square kilometre Greenland
2010s 5,483 current LCU per square kilometre 6,950 current LCU per square kilometre 1,467 current LCU per square kilometre Greenland
2020s 9,975 current LCU per square kilometre 8,347 current LCU per square kilometre 1,628 current LCU per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Aruba or Greenland?
Aruba, at 14,728 current LCU per square kilometre against 9,246 current LCU per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Aruba and Greenland?
5,482 current LCU per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Greenland?
21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Greenland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Aruba ranks 192nd and Greenland ranks 194th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Greenland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/aruba/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/aruba/greenland/">Aruba vs Greenland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.