Aruba vs Australia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Aruba
14,728 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia
8,616 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
192nd
Australia rank
195th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Aruba
  • Australia
020.0k40.0k60.0k199020062023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 14,728 current LCU per square kilometre against 8,616 current LCU per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 6,112 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.7 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 192nd and Australia ranks 195th of 203 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Australia Difference Ahead
1990s 66,367 current LCU per square kilometre 2,279 current LCU per square kilometre 64,087 current LCU per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 4,108 current LCU per square kilometre 3,391 current LCU per square kilometre 716.86 current LCU per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 5,483 current LCU per square kilometre 4,961 current LCU per square kilometre 521.32 current LCU per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 9,975 current LCU per square kilometre 7,053 current LCU per square kilometre 2,922 current LCU per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Aruba or Australia?
Aruba, at 14,728 current LCU per square kilometre against 8,616 current LCU per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Aruba and Australia?
6,112 current LCU per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Australia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Australia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Aruba ranks 192nd and Australia ranks 195th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Australia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/aruba/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/aruba/australia/">Aruba vs Australia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.