Angola vs Mauritius: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Angola
13.00 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
12.80 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
40th
Mauritius rank
42nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Angola
  • Mauritius
05.0M10.0M15.0M197619992023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 13.00 million current LCU per square kilometre against 12.80 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 198,400 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mauritius ahead.

Angola ranks 40th and Mauritius ranks 42nd of 203 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 290,501 current LCU per square kilometre 4.93 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.64 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 1.86 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.46 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.60 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 8.68 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.48 million current LCU per square kilometre 800,308 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Angola or Mauritius?
Angola, at 13.00 million current LCU per square kilometre against 12.80 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Angola and Mauritius?
198,400 current LCU per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Mauritius?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Angola and Mauritius rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Angola ranks 40th and Mauritius ranks 42nd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Mauritius: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/angola/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/angola/mauritius/">Angola vs Mauritius: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.