Afghanistan vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Afghanistan
719,608 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
733,459 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
92nd
Guatemala rank
90th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Guatemala
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196519942023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 733,459 current LCU per square kilometre against 719,608 current LCU per square kilometre in Afghanistan, a difference of 13,851 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guatemala ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 92nd and Guatemala ranks 90th of 203 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Guatemala Difference Ahead
2000s 167,989 current LCU per square kilometre 257,480 current LCU per square kilometre 89,490 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 420,332 current LCU per square kilometre 431,749 current LCU per square kilometre 11,416 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 683,182 current LCU per square kilometre 622,364 current LCU per square kilometre 60,818 current LCU per square kilometre Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Afghanistan or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 733,459 current LCU per square kilometre against 719,608 current LCU per square kilometre in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Afghanistan and Guatemala?
13,851 current LCU per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Guatemala?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Guatemala rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Afghanistan ranks 92nd and Guatemala ranks 90th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/guatemala/">Afghanistan vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.