Latvia vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Latvia
933.65 current LCU per person
in 2025
Micronesia, Federated States of
1,067 current LCU per person
in 2025
Latvia rank
145th
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
142nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Latvia
  • Micronesia, Federated States of
02004006008001.0k198320042025

How they compare

Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 1,067 current LCU per person against 933.65 current LCU per person in Latvia, a difference of 133.35 current LCU per person.

That makes Micronesia, Federated States of's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.

Latvia ranks 145th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 142nd of 206 countries.

Micronesia, Federated States of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Micronesia, Federated States of Difference Ahead
1990s 110.93 current LCU per person 466.64 current LCU per person 355.71 current LCU per person Micronesia, Federated States of
2000s 223.16 current LCU per person 535.4 current LCU per person 312.25 current LCU per person Micronesia, Federated States of
2010s 428.69 current LCU per person 793.43 current LCU per person 364.74 current LCU per person Micronesia, Federated States of
2020s 824.98 current LCU per person 885.82 current LCU per person 60.84 current LCU per person Micronesia, Federated States of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Latvia or Micronesia, Federated States of?
Micronesia, Federated States of, at 1,067 current LCU per person against 933.65 current LCU per person in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Latvia and Micronesia, Federated States of?
133.35 current LCU per person, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Micronesia, Federated States of?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Latvia ranks 145th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 142nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-capita/latvia/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-capita/latvia/micronesia-fed-sts/">Latvia vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per capita
Unit
current LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.