Equatorial Guinea vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Equatorial Guinea
123,449 current LCU per person
in 2025
Pakistan
102,656 current LCU per person
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
51st
Pakistan rank
54th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Pakistan
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196019922025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 123,449 current LCU per person against 102,656 current LCU per person in Pakistan, a difference of 20,793 current LCU per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 51st and Pakistan ranks 54th of 206 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Pakistan Difference Ahead
2000s 75,697 current LCU per person 13,285 current LCU per person 62,412 current LCU per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 95,413 current LCU per person 30,317 current LCU per person 65,096 current LCU per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 114,131 current LCU per person 73,225 current LCU per person 40,906 current LCU per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Equatorial Guinea or Pakistan?
Equatorial Guinea, at 123,449 current LCU per person against 102,656 current LCU per person in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Equatorial Guinea and Pakistan?
20,793 current LCU per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Pakistan?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Pakistan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 51st and Pakistan ranks 54th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/pakistan/">Equatorial Guinea vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per capita
Unit
current LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.