Australia vs Belarus: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Australia
2,281 current LCU per person
in 2025
Belarus
2,177 current LCU per person
in 2025
Australia rank
122nd
Belarus rank
123rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Australia
  • Belarus
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199020072025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 2,281 current LCU per person against 2,177 current LCU per person in Belarus, a difference of 104 current LCU per person.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 122nd and Belarus ranks 123rd of 206 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 892.61 current LCU per person 0.5659 current LCU per person 892.04 current LCU per person Australia
2000s 1,290 current LCU per person 58.57 current LCU per person 1,231 current LCU per person Australia
2010s 1,605 current LCU per person 595.76 current LCU per person 1,010 current LCU per person Australia
2020s 2,102 current LCU per person 1,660 current LCU per person 442.41 current LCU per person Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Australia or Belarus?
Australia, at 2,281 current LCU per person against 2,177 current LCU per person in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Australia and Belarus?
104 current LCU per person, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belarus?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and Belarus rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Australia ranks 122nd and Belarus ranks 123rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Belarus: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-capita/australia/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-capita/australia/belarus/">Australia vs Belarus: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per capita
Unit
current LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.