Uganda vs Uzbekistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Uganda
37.56 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Uzbekistan
39.98 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Uganda rank
8th
Uzbekistan rank
7th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Uganda
  • Uzbekistan
10.0T20.0T30.0T40.0T198220032025

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 39.98 trillion constant LCU against 37.56 trillion constant LCU in Uganda, a difference of 2.42 trillion constant LCU.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Uganda ahead.

Uganda ranks 8th and Uzbekistan ranks 7th of 197 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Uganda averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uganda Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1980s 10.96 trillion constant LCU 10.21 trillion constant LCU 757.49 billion constant LCU Uganda
1990s 14.24 trillion constant LCU 10.59 trillion constant LCU 3.65 trillion constant LCU Uganda
2000s 19.58 trillion constant LCU 15.59 trillion constant LCU 3.99 trillion constant LCU Uganda
2010s 24.23 trillion constant LCU 27.42 trillion constant LCU 3.19 trillion constant LCU Uzbekistan
2020s 32.98 trillion constant LCU 36.39 trillion constant LCU 3.41 trillion constant LCU Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Uganda or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 39.98 trillion constant LCU against 37.56 trillion constant LCU in Uganda as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Uganda and Uzbekistan?
2.42 trillion constant LCU, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Uzbekistan?
39 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2025.
How do Uganda and Uzbekistan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Uganda ranks 8th and Uzbekistan ranks 7th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uganda vs Uzbekistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/uganda/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/uganda/uzbekistan/">Uganda vs Uzbekistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.