Trinidad and Tobago vs Palestine: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Trinidad and Tobago
679.99 million constant LCU
in 2024
Palestine
622.80 million constant LCU
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago rank
160th
Palestine rank
163rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Palestine
500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B198420042025

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 679.99 million constant LCU against 622.80 million constant LCU in Palestine, a difference of 57.19 million constant LCU.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Palestine's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Trinidad and Tobago ranks 160th and Palestine ranks 163rd of 197 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Trinidad and Tobago averaged higher in 3 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Trinidad and Tobago Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 1.79 billion constant LCU 679.62 million constant LCU 1.11 billion constant LCU Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 1.48 billion constant LCU 737.10 million constant LCU 741.16 million constant LCU Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 1.18 billion constant LCU 1.07 billion constant LCU 110.18 million constant LCU Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 817.40 million constant LCU 838.96 million constant LCU 21.56 million constant LCU Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Trinidad and Tobago or Palestine?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 679.99 million constant LCU against 622.80 million constant LCU in Palestine as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Trinidad and Tobago and Palestine?
57.19 million constant LCU, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Palestine?
31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Trinidad and Tobago and Palestine rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 160th and Palestine ranks 163rd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trinidad and Tobago vs Palestine: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/trinidad-and-tobago/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/trinidad-and-tobago/west-bank-and-gaza/">Trinidad and Tobago vs Palestine: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.