Tanzania, United Republic of vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Tanzania, United Republic of
36.84 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Uganda
37.56 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
9th
Uganda rank
8th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Uganda
10.0T20.0T30.0T40.0T198220032025

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 37.56 trillion constant LCU against 36.84 trillion constant LCU in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 724.90 billion constant LCU.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uganda ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 9th and Uganda ranks 8th of 197 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Tanzania, United Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 11.18 trillion constant LCU 14.24 trillion constant LCU 3.06 trillion constant LCU Uganda
2000s 16.38 trillion constant LCU 19.58 trillion constant LCU 3.21 trillion constant LCU Uganda
2010s 24.85 trillion constant LCU 24.23 trillion constant LCU 614.41 billion constant LCU Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 33.81 trillion constant LCU 32.98 trillion constant LCU 829.80 billion constant LCU Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Tanzania, United Republic of or Uganda?
Uganda, at 37.56 trillion constant LCU against 36.84 trillion constant LCU in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Tanzania, United Republic of and Uganda?
724.90 billion constant LCU, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Uganda?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Uganda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 9th and Uganda ranks 8th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/tanzania/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/tanzania/uganda/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.