Sri Lanka vs Togo: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Sri Lanka
929.67 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Togo
1.07 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
45th
Togo rank
43rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Togo
200.0B400.0B600.0B800.0B1.0T196019922025

How they compare

Togo currently reports 1.07 trillion constant LCU against 929.67 billion constant LCU in Sri Lanka, a difference of 139.41 billion constant LCU.

That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 45th and Togo ranks 43rd of 197 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 6 and Togo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Togo Difference Ahead
1960s 252.85 billion constant LCU 158.26 billion constant LCU 94.59 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka
1970s 303.47 billion constant LCU 178.19 billion constant LCU 125.28 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka
1980s 418.28 billion constant LCU 258.33 billion constant LCU 159.95 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka
1990s 505.84 billion constant LCU 392.33 billion constant LCU 113.52 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka
2000s 596.23 billion constant LCU 495.55 billion constant LCU 100.68 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka
2010s 876.79 billion constant LCU 694.02 billion constant LCU 182.77 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka
2020s 926.89 billion constant LCU 969.15 billion constant LCU 42.26 billion constant LCU Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Sri Lanka or Togo?
Togo, at 1.07 trillion constant LCU against 929.67 billion constant LCU in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Sri Lanka and Togo?
139.41 billion constant LCU, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Togo?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Sri Lanka and Togo rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Sri Lanka ranks 45th and Togo ranks 43rd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Togo: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/sri-lanka/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/sri-lanka/togo/">Sri Lanka vs Togo: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.