Slovenia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Slovenia
848.00 million constant LCU
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
679.99 million constant LCU
in 2024
Slovenia rank
157th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
160th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Slovenia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B198420042025

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 848.00 million constant LCU against 679.99 million constant LCU in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 168.01 million constant LCU.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.2 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Slovenia ranks 157th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 160th of 197 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 763.97 million constant LCU 1.83 billion constant LCU 1.06 billion constant LCU Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 776.95 million constant LCU 1.48 billion constant LCU 701.32 million constant LCU Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 761.76 million constant LCU 1.18 billion constant LCU 416.08 million constant LCU Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 812.99 million constant LCU 817.40 million constant LCU 4.41 million constant LCU Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Slovenia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Slovenia, at 848.00 million constant LCU against 679.99 million constant LCU in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Slovenia and Trinidad and Tobago?
168.01 million constant LCU, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Trinidad and Tobago?
30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Slovenia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Slovenia ranks 157th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 160th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovenia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/slovenia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/slovenia/trinidad-and-tobago/">Slovenia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.