Singapore vs Saint Lucia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Singapore
157.00 million constant LCU
in 2025
Saint Lucia
104.00 million constant LCU
in 2025
Singapore rank
177th
Saint Lucia rank
179th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Singapore
  • Saint Lucia
100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196019922025

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 157.00 million constant LCU against 104.00 million constant LCU in Saint Lucia, a difference of 53.00 million constant LCU.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.5 times Saint Lucia's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 177th and Saint Lucia ranks 179th of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 5 and Saint Lucia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1970s 385.77 million constant LCU 119.55 million constant LCU 266.21 million constant LCU Singapore
1980s 367.30 million constant LCU 159.68 million constant LCU 207.62 million constant LCU Singapore
1990s 201.27 million constant LCU 206.32 million constant LCU 5.05 million constant LCU Saint Lucia
2000s 122.73 million constant LCU 112.80 million constant LCU 9.93 million constant LCU Singapore
2010s 136.44 million constant LCU 82.15 million constant LCU 54.29 million constant LCU Singapore
2020s 157.72 million constant LCU 91.30 million constant LCU 66.42 million constant LCU Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Singapore or Saint Lucia?
Singapore, at 157.00 million constant LCU against 104.00 million constant LCU in Saint Lucia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Singapore and Saint Lucia?
53.00 million constant LCU, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Saint Lucia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2025.
How do Singapore and Saint Lucia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Singapore ranks 177th and Saint Lucia ranks 179th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Saint Lucia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/singapore/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/singapore/st-lucia/">Singapore vs Saint Lucia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.