Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Papua New Guinea
11.37 billion constant LCU
in 2024
Zambia
10.81 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
114th
Zambia rank
115th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zambia
02.5B5.0B7.5B10.0B12.5B196119932025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 11.37 billion constant LCU against 10.81 billion constant LCU in Zambia, a difference of 560.60 million constant LCU.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zambia ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 114th and Zambia ranks 115th of 197 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.11 billion constant LCU 5.54 billion constant LCU 4.44 billion constant LCU Zambia
1970s 1.40 billion constant LCU 6.68 billion constant LCU 5.28 billion constant LCU Zambia
1980s 1.81 billion constant LCU 7.95 billion constant LCU 6.13 billion constant LCU Zambia
1990s 2.56 billion constant LCU 9.68 billion constant LCU 7.12 billion constant LCU Zambia
2000s 5.03 billion constant LCU 10.42 billion constant LCU 5.39 billion constant LCU Zambia
2010s 9.30 billion constant LCU 9.51 billion constant LCU 207.54 million constant LCU Zambia
2020s 10.97 billion constant LCU 9.28 billion constant LCU 1.69 billion constant LCU Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Papua New Guinea or Zambia?
Papua New Guinea, at 11.37 billion constant LCU against 10.81 billion constant LCU in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
560.60 million constant LCU, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zambia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Papua New Guinea ranks 114th and Zambia ranks 115th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/papua-new-guinea/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/papua-new-guinea/zambia/">Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.