Papua New Guinea vs United Kingdom: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Papua New Guinea
11.37 billion constant LCU
in 2024
United Kingdom
15.58 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
114th
United Kingdom rank
111th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • United Kingdom
05.0B10.0B15.0B196119932025

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 15.58 billion constant LCU against 11.37 billion constant LCU in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 4.20 billion constant LCU.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.4 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 114th and United Kingdom ranks 111th of 197 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1990s 2.56 billion constant LCU 8.11 billion constant LCU 5.54 billion constant LCU United Kingdom
2000s 5.03 billion constant LCU 12.35 billion constant LCU 7.32 billion constant LCU United Kingdom
2010s 9.30 billion constant LCU 13.56 billion constant LCU 4.26 billion constant LCU United Kingdom
2020s 10.97 billion constant LCU 15.19 billion constant LCU 4.22 billion constant LCU United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Papua New Guinea or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 15.58 billion constant LCU against 11.37 billion constant LCU in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Papua New Guinea and United Kingdom?
4.20 billion constant LCU, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and United Kingdom?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and United Kingdom rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Papua New Guinea ranks 114th and United Kingdom ranks 111th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs United Kingdom: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/papua-new-guinea/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/papua-new-guinea/united-kingdom/">Papua New Guinea vs United Kingdom: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.