Nepal vs Thailand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Nepal
725.01 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Thailand
734.84 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Nepal rank
51st
Thailand rank
50th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Nepal
  • Thailand
200.0B400.0B600.0B800.0B196019922025

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 734.84 billion constant LCU against 725.01 billion constant LCU in Nepal, a difference of 9.83 billion constant LCU.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

Nepal ranks 51st and Thailand ranks 50th of 197 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 153.42 billion constant LCU 228.21 billion constant LCU 74.79 billion constant LCU Thailand
1970s 170.51 billion constant LCU 323.41 billion constant LCU 152.91 billion constant LCU Thailand
1980s 207.89 billion constant LCU 480.47 billion constant LCU 272.58 billion constant LCU Thailand
1990s 284.76 billion constant LCU 478.13 billion constant LCU 193.37 billion constant LCU Thailand
2000s 391.22 billion constant LCU 553.26 billion constant LCU 162.04 billion constant LCU Thailand
2010s 534.42 billion constant LCU 642.39 billion constant LCU 107.97 billion constant LCU Thailand
2020s 674.95 billion constant LCU 688.59 billion constant LCU 13.64 billion constant LCU Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Nepal or Thailand?
Thailand, at 734.84 billion constant LCU against 725.01 billion constant LCU in Nepal as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Nepal and Thailand?
9.83 billion constant LCU, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Thailand?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Nepal and Thailand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Nepal ranks 51st and Thailand ranks 50th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Thailand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/nepal/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/nepal/thailand/">Nepal vs Thailand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.