Namibia vs United Arab Emirates: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Namibia
10.27 billion constant LCU
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
13.02 billion constant LCU
in 2024
Namibia rank
116th
United Arab Emirates rank
113th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Namibia
  • United Arab Emirates
05.0B10.0B15.0B197520002025

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 13.02 billion constant LCU against 10.27 billion constant LCU in Namibia, a difference of 2.75 billion constant LCU.

That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 116th and United Arab Emirates ranks 113th of 197 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 4 and United Arab Emirates in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1980s 7.20 billion constant LCU 2.05 billion constant LCU 5.15 billion constant LCU Namibia
1990s 8.64 billion constant LCU 6.41 billion constant LCU 2.23 billion constant LCU Namibia
2000s 11.57 billion constant LCU 11.38 billion constant LCU 193.80 million constant LCU Namibia
2010s 10.83 billion constant LCU 9.35 billion constant LCU 1.47 billion constant LCU Namibia
2020s 10.98 billion constant LCU 12.55 billion constant LCU 1.57 billion constant LCU United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Namibia or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 13.02 billion constant LCU against 10.27 billion constant LCU in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Namibia and United Arab Emirates?
2.75 billion constant LCU, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and United Arab Emirates?
45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Namibia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Namibia ranks 116th and United Arab Emirates ranks 113th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs United Arab Emirates: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/namibia/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/namibia/united-arab-emirates/">Namibia vs United Arab Emirates: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.