Namibia vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Namibia
10.27 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
11.37 billion constant LCU
in 2024
Namibia rank
116th
Papua New Guinea rank
114th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Namibia
  • Papua New Guinea
05.0B10.0B15.0B196119932025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 11.37 billion constant LCU against 10.27 billion constant LCU in Namibia, a difference of 1.10 billion constant LCU.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 116th and Papua New Guinea ranks 114th of 197 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1980s 7.20 billion constant LCU 1.81 billion constant LCU 5.39 billion constant LCU Namibia
1990s 8.64 billion constant LCU 2.56 billion constant LCU 6.08 billion constant LCU Namibia
2000s 11.33 billion constant LCU 5.03 billion constant LCU 6.30 billion constant LCU Namibia
2010s 10.83 billion constant LCU 9.30 billion constant LCU 1.53 billion constant LCU Namibia
2020s 10.98 billion constant LCU 10.97 billion constant LCU 7.50 million constant LCU Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Namibia or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 11.37 billion constant LCU against 10.27 billion constant LCU in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Namibia and Papua New Guinea?
1.10 billion constant LCU, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Papua New Guinea?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Namibia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Namibia ranks 116th and Papua New Guinea ranks 114th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/namibia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/namibia/papua-new-guinea/">Namibia vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.