Mongolia vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Mongolia
3.68 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Russian Federation
3.74 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Mongolia rank
30th
Russian Federation rank
28th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Mongolia
  • Russian Federation
1.0T2.0T3.0T4.0T198120032025

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 3.74 trillion constant LCU against 3.68 trillion constant LCU in Mongolia, a difference of 57.39 billion constant LCU.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Mongolia ranks 30th and Russian Federation ranks 28th of 197 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 1.79 trillion constant LCU 2.51 trillion constant LCU 716.25 billion constant LCU Russian Federation
2000s 1.64 trillion constant LCU 2.70 trillion constant LCU 1.06 trillion constant LCU Russian Federation
2010s 2.86 trillion constant LCU 3.15 trillion constant LCU 289.15 billion constant LCU Russian Federation
2020s 3.73 trillion constant LCU 3.67 trillion constant LCU 63.90 billion constant LCU Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Mongolia or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 3.74 trillion constant LCU against 3.68 trillion constant LCU in Mongolia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Mongolia and Russian Federation?
57.39 billion constant LCU, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Russian Federation?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Mongolia and Russian Federation rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Mongolia ranks 30th and Russian Federation ranks 28th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/mongolia/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/mongolia/russian-federation/">Mongolia vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.