Mexico vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Mexico
868.96 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Sri Lanka
929.67 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Mexico rank
48th
Sri Lanka rank
45th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Mexico
  • Sri Lanka
200.0B400.0B600.0B800.0B1.0T196019922025

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 929.67 billion constant LCU against 868.96 billion constant LCU in Mexico, a difference of 60.71 billion constant LCU.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 48th and Sri Lanka ranks 45th of 197 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 273.07 billion constant LCU 252.85 billion constant LCU 20.23 billion constant LCU Mexico
1970s 339.89 billion constant LCU 303.47 billion constant LCU 36.41 billion constant LCU Mexico
1980s 444.12 billion constant LCU 418.28 billion constant LCU 25.84 billion constant LCU Mexico
1990s 503.70 billion constant LCU 505.84 billion constant LCU 2.14 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka
2000s 605.61 billion constant LCU 596.23 billion constant LCU 9.38 billion constant LCU Mexico
2010s 724.28 billion constant LCU 876.79 billion constant LCU 152.51 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka
2020s 834.90 billion constant LCU 926.89 billion constant LCU 91.99 billion constant LCU Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Mexico or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 929.67 billion constant LCU against 868.96 billion constant LCU in Mexico as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Mexico and Sri Lanka?
60.71 billion constant LCU, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sri Lanka?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Mexico and Sri Lanka rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Mexico ranks 48th and Sri Lanka ranks 45th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/mexico/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/mexico/sri-lanka/">Mexico vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.