Mexico vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Mexico
868.96 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Nepal
725.01 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Mexico rank
48th
Nepal rank
51st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Mexico
  • Nepal
200.0B400.0B600.0B800.0B196519952025

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 868.96 billion constant LCU against 725.01 billion constant LCU in Nepal, a difference of 143.94 billion constant LCU.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.2 times Nepal's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 48th and Nepal ranks 51st of 197 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 273.07 billion constant LCU 153.42 billion constant LCU 119.65 billion constant LCU Mexico
1970s 339.89 billion constant LCU 170.51 billion constant LCU 169.38 billion constant LCU Mexico
1980s 444.12 billion constant LCU 207.89 billion constant LCU 236.24 billion constant LCU Mexico
1990s 503.70 billion constant LCU 284.76 billion constant LCU 218.94 billion constant LCU Mexico
2000s 605.61 billion constant LCU 391.22 billion constant LCU 214.40 billion constant LCU Mexico
2010s 724.28 billion constant LCU 534.42 billion constant LCU 189.87 billion constant LCU Mexico
2020s 834.90 billion constant LCU 674.95 billion constant LCU 159.94 billion constant LCU Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Mexico or Nepal?
Mexico, at 868.96 billion constant LCU against 725.01 billion constant LCU in Nepal as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Mexico and Nepal?
143.94 billion constant LCU, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Nepal?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Mexico and Nepal rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Mexico ranks 48th and Nepal ranks 51st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/mexico/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/mexico/nepal/">Mexico vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.