Mali vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Mali
4.23 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Rwanda
4.45 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Mali rank
25th
Rwanda rank
23rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Mali
  • Rwanda
01.0T2.0T3.0T4.0T196519952025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 4.45 trillion constant LCU against 4.23 trillion constant LCU in Mali, a difference of 215.66 billion constant LCU.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Rwanda ahead.

Mali ranks 25th and Rwanda ranks 23rd of 197 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 299.75 billion constant LCU 458.50 billion constant LCU 158.75 billion constant LCU Rwanda
1970s 643.92 billion constant LCU 646.49 billion constant LCU 2.57 billion constant LCU Rwanda
1980s 1.06 trillion constant LCU 1.00 trillion constant LCU 53.42 billion constant LCU Mali
1990s 1.40 trillion constant LCU 988.74 billion constant LCU 412.85 billion constant LCU Mali
2000s 1.74 trillion constant LCU 1.85 trillion constant LCU 111.16 billion constant LCU Rwanda
2010s 2.74 trillion constant LCU 2.92 trillion constant LCU 177.01 billion constant LCU Rwanda
2020s 3.68 trillion constant LCU 3.99 trillion constant LCU 310.16 billion constant LCU Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Mali or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 4.45 trillion constant LCU against 4.23 trillion constant LCU in Mali as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Mali and Rwanda?
215.66 billion constant LCU, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Rwanda?
59 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2025.
How do Mali and Rwanda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Mali ranks 25th and Rwanda ranks 23rd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/mali/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/mali/rwanda/">Mali vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.