Malaysia vs Saudi Arabia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Malaysia
105.69 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Saudi Arabia
121.56 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Malaysia rank
75th
Saudi Arabia rank
72nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Malaysia
  • Saudi Arabia
025.0B50.0B75.0B100.0B125.0B196819962025

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 121.56 billion constant LCU against 105.69 billion constant LCU in Malaysia, a difference of 15.87 billion constant LCU.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.2 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 75th and Saudi Arabia ranks 72nd of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 5 and Saudi Arabia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1970s 34.73 billion constant LCU 12.37 billion constant LCU 22.36 billion constant LCU Malaysia
1980s 50.69 billion constant LCU 28.53 billion constant LCU 22.16 billion constant LCU Malaysia
1990s 60.67 billion constant LCU 52.09 billion constant LCU 8.58 billion constant LCU Malaysia
2000s 73.63 billion constant LCU 61.55 billion constant LCU 12.08 billion constant LCU Malaysia
2010s 95.21 billion constant LCU 88.61 billion constant LCU 6.60 billion constant LCU Malaysia
2020s 101.28 billion constant LCU 111.47 billion constant LCU 10.19 billion constant LCU Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Malaysia or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 121.56 billion constant LCU against 105.69 billion constant LCU in Malaysia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Malaysia and Saudi Arabia?
15.87 billion constant LCU, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Saudi Arabia?
56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Malaysia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Malaysia ranks 75th and Saudi Arabia ranks 72nd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Saudi Arabia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/malaysia/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/malaysia/saudi-arabia/">Malaysia vs Saudi Arabia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.