Latvia vs Oman: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Latvia
1.00 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Oman
1.13 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Latvia rank
154th
Oman rank
152nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Latvia
  • Oman
200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B1.2B199520102025

How they compare

Oman currently reports 1.13 billion constant LCU against 1.00 billion constant LCU in Latvia, a difference of 130.34 million constant LCU.

That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 154th and Oman ranks 152nd of 197 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Oman Difference Ahead
1990s 610.75 million constant LCU 225.25 million constant LCU 385.50 million constant LCU Latvia
2000s 828.72 million constant LCU 242.18 million constant LCU 586.53 million constant LCU Latvia
2010s 1.00 billion constant LCU 440.32 million constant LCU 563.35 million constant LCU Latvia
2020s 1.08 billion constant LCU 942.07 million constant LCU 134.30 million constant LCU Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Latvia or Oman?
Oman, at 1.13 billion constant LCU against 1.00 billion constant LCU in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Latvia and Oman?
130.34 million constant LCU, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Oman?
28 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Oman rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Latvia ranks 154th and Oman ranks 152nd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Oman: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/latvia/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/latvia/oman/">Latvia vs Oman: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.