Kyrgyzstan vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Kyrgyzstan
76.54 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Norway
59.43 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
78th
Norway rank
80th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Norway
20.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B197019972025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 76.54 billion constant LCU against 59.43 billion constant LCU in Norway, a difference of 17.11 billion constant LCU.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.3 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 78th and Norway ranks 80th of 197 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Norway Difference Ahead
1980s 38.02 billion constant LCU 27.98 billion constant LCU 10.04 billion constant LCU Kyrgyzstan
1990s 36.69 billion constant LCU 36.37 billion constant LCU 320.06 million constant LCU Kyrgyzstan
2000s 50.87 billion constant LCU 42.80 billion constant LCU 8.07 billion constant LCU Kyrgyzstan
2010s 60.64 billion constant LCU 57.59 billion constant LCU 3.05 billion constant LCU Kyrgyzstan
2020s 70.97 billion constant LCU 61.02 billion constant LCU 9.95 billion constant LCU Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Kyrgyzstan or Norway?
Kyrgyzstan, at 76.54 billion constant LCU against 59.43 billion constant LCU in Norway as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Kyrgyzstan and Norway?
17.11 billion constant LCU, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Norway?
39 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2025.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Norway rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 78th and Norway ranks 80th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/kyrgyz-republic/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/kyrgyz-republic/norway/">Kyrgyzstan vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.