Korea vs Paraguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Korea
33.94 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Paraguay
25.13 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Korea rank
10th
Paraguay rank
11th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Korea
  • Paraguay
010.0T20.0T30.0T40.0T196019922025

How they compare

Korea currently reports 33.94 trillion constant LCU against 25.13 trillion constant LCU in Paraguay, a difference of 8.81 trillion constant LCU.

That makes Korea's figure about 1.4 times Paraguay's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.

Korea ranks 10th and Paraguay ranks 11th of 197 countries.

Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Paraguay Difference Ahead
1960s 11.88 trillion constant LCU 1.91 trillion constant LCU 9.97 trillion constant LCU Korea
1970s 16.80 trillion constant LCU 2.84 trillion constant LCU 13.96 trillion constant LCU Korea
1980s 22.27 trillion constant LCU 4.82 trillion constant LCU 17.45 trillion constant LCU Korea
1990s 27.16 trillion constant LCU 7.66 trillion constant LCU 19.49 trillion constant LCU Korea
2000s 30.04 trillion constant LCU 11.34 trillion constant LCU 18.70 trillion constant LCU Korea
2010s 34.26 trillion constant LCU 20.31 trillion constant LCU 13.94 trillion constant LCU Korea
2020s 33.43 trillion constant LCU 22.41 trillion constant LCU 11.02 trillion constant LCU Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Korea or Paraguay?
Korea, at 33.94 trillion constant LCU against 25.13 trillion constant LCU in Paraguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Korea and Paraguay?
8.81 trillion constant LCU, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Paraguay?
64 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2025.
How do Korea and Paraguay rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Korea ranks 10th and Paraguay ranks 11th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Paraguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/korea-rep/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/korea-rep/paraguay/">Korea vs Paraguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.