Kiribati vs Saint Lucia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Kiribati
83.43 million constant LCU
in 2024
Saint Lucia
104.00 million constant LCU
in 2025
Kiribati rank
182nd
Saint Lucia rank
179th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Kiribati
  • Saint Lucia
50.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M197720012025

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 104.00 million constant LCU against 83.43 million constant LCU in Kiribati, a difference of 20.57 million constant LCU.

That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Kiribati ranks 182nd and Saint Lucia ranks 179th of 197 countries.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1970s 57.82 million constant LCU 124.00 million constant LCU 66.18 million constant LCU Saint Lucia
1980s 49.05 million constant LCU 159.68 million constant LCU 110.63 million constant LCU Saint Lucia
1990s 63.24 million constant LCU 206.32 million constant LCU 143.08 million constant LCU Saint Lucia
2000s 55.08 million constant LCU 112.80 million constant LCU 57.72 million constant LCU Saint Lucia
2010s 68.68 million constant LCU 82.15 million constant LCU 13.46 million constant LCU Saint Lucia
2020s 83.93 million constant LCU 88.76 million constant LCU 4.83 million constant LCU Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Kiribati or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 104.00 million constant LCU against 83.43 million constant LCU in Kiribati as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Kiribati and Saint Lucia?
20.57 million constant LCU, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Saint Lucia?
46 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Saint Lucia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Kiribati ranks 182nd and Saint Lucia ranks 179th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Saint Lucia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/kiribati/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/kiribati/st-lucia/">Kiribati vs Saint Lucia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.