Kenya vs Philippines: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Kenya
1.92 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Philippines
1.83 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Kenya rank
37th
Philippines rank
39th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Kenya
  • Philippines
500.0B1.0T1.5T2.0T196019922025

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 1.92 trillion constant LCU against 1.83 trillion constant LCU in Philippines, a difference of 87.45 billion constant LCU.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Philippines ahead.

Kenya ranks 37th and Philippines ranks 39th of 197 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 327.93 billion constant LCU 489.00 billion constant LCU 161.07 billion constant LCU Philippines
1970s 484.86 billion constant LCU 650.97 billion constant LCU 166.11 billion constant LCU Philippines
1980s 702.71 billion constant LCU 820.24 billion constant LCU 117.53 billion constant LCU Philippines
1990s 865.33 billion constant LCU 943.69 billion constant LCU 78.36 billion constant LCU Philippines
2000s 1.14 trillion constant LCU 1.28 trillion constant LCU 142.55 billion constant LCU Philippines
2010s 1.46 trillion constant LCU 1.66 trillion constant LCU 202.99 billion constant LCU Philippines
2020s 1.77 trillion constant LCU 1.79 trillion constant LCU 17.80 billion constant LCU Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Kenya or Philippines?
Kenya, at 1.92 trillion constant LCU against 1.83 trillion constant LCU in Philippines as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Kenya and Philippines?
87.45 billion constant LCU, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Philippines?
62 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2025.
How do Kenya and Philippines rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Kenya ranks 37th and Philippines ranks 39th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Philippines: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/kenya/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu/kenya/philippines/">Kenya vs Philippines: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.